Sandy Spring-Ashton

Rural Preservation Consortium (SSARPC)

The SSARPC supports development in the area that conforms to the

Sandy Spring-Ashton Master Plan. We are pro-Master Plan, not anti-development.


Click for a larger picture Click for a larger picture Click for a larger picture Along Route 108 in Sandy Spring, click for a larger picture Click for a larger picture Sandy Spring Museum, click for a larger picture Click for a larger picture Click for a larger picture Click for a larger picture

Rural Ashton and Sandy Spring



Alternate vision for Ashton center ready for debut

 Wednesday, June 21, 2006

A group of residents who favor a smaller development than the proposed Ashton Meeting Place mixed-use center will unveil a design they have been working on for months at a community meeting on Thursday.

The Sandy Spring Ashton Rural Preserve Consortium will give a three-dimensional, virtual tour of its proposed plan, which it says follows master plan guidelines. The meeting is set for 7 p.m. in the Sandy Spring Friends Meeting House on Meeting House Road.

The virtual ‘‘walk through” will help give people a sense of the size, layout and design of the buildings. A computer simulation of the Ashton Meeting Place project, a 97,000-square-foot retail, office and residential development at routes 108 and 650, will be presented for comparison.

Town planning expert Stuart Sirota, of TND Planning Group in Baltimore, was hired by the consortium in April to help bring its vision for a village center with rural character to life.

Consortium member Brooke Farquhar calls Sirota a ‘‘consensus builder” who was able to formulate a concept that features smaller buildings, active storefronts on routes 108 and 650 and green space that complies with the master plan and zoning ordinance.

Ashton Meeting Place developer Fred Nichols has consistently disagreed with the consortium’s assertion that his project does not follow the master plan.

‘‘Our development plans for Ashton Meeting Place were prepared in complete accordance with the Sandy Spring-Ashton Master Plan and current zoning,” Nichols said earlier this year. ‘‘We have shared them openly and honestly through many meetings with the entire community.”

The consortium’s lawyer, David Brown, who also represents Clarksburg Town Center residents in Clarksburg, will explain how the Nichols plan does not comply with the Sandy Spring⁄Ashton rural village overlay zone, Farquhar said.

Brown and the consortium have forwarded an analysis detailing the Nichols plan’s violations to Park and Planning staff and the development team, Farquhar said.

The design changes Nichols has made are not ‘‘meaningful revisions,” Farquhar said.

Reducing tower heights and placing ‘‘fake” fronts on the back of a grocery store that would face Route 108 does not address the elements that make the Nichols project just another suburban, car-oriented design, she said.

‘‘These things don’t make a really walkable village center, which is what the master plan envisions for Ashton and Sandy Spring,” Farquhar said.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SSARPC - PreserveAshton.net NOTE: Community meeting: June 22nd - 7PM- Sandy Spring Friends Meeting House - Meeting House Road - All Welcome 

 

 

Date:         Wed, 21 Jun 2006 07:41:53 EDT
From:         Sandy Spring-Ashton Rural Preservation Consortium
              <SSARPC@SSARPC.org>
Subject:      Alternate vision for Ashton center ready for debut

[Table of Contents]

First page Previous page

   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   

Next page Last page

Page 70 of 93